The question often arises as to whether an Arc Thermal Performance Value (ATPV) or an Energy Breakopen Threshold (EBT) is better protection in a garment system. When ASTM F1959/F1959M – 12 (The Standard Test Method for Determining the Arc Rating of Materials for Clothing) was in development we quickly recognized that some materials allow skin burn prediction to be reached before they “broke open” and others would not. Initially these became two ratings. One was called an ATPV and the other was an EBT. Initially one was marketed as “better” than the other because the materials tested did not exhibit the “breakopen” phenomena. This finding was erroneous and later determined every fiber type can breakopen before its burn prediction level was reached. This happened most commonly in knits vs. wovens.
Each of these constructions and all fibers have their advantages and disadvantages. The committee decided to rename the term Arc Rating. With much consideration the committee decided to leave the term EBT and ATPV as a subscript or an addendum to the term Arc Rating. Both are a 50% probability of the behavior at which the material compared to a burn model can give a second degree burn. The EBT has not exhibited a second degree burn on the sensors in most cases because the material has a one inch crack or a ½ square inch hole which is not directly over the sensor. Theoretically if this had happened over the sensor there would have been a burn predicted so we cut off the rating there. Both Arc Ratings are expressed in calorie/cm². The lowest is always reported. Each material receives an EBT or an ATPV but both can be reported. Only the lowest can be used as the Arc Rating on the clothing according to the ASTM F1506 specification.
ATPV (Arc Thermal Performance Value) is the incident energy on a material that results in a 50% probability that sufficient heat transfer through the specimen is predicted to cause the onset of second-degree burn injury based on the Stoll Curve, cal/cm².
Energy Breakopen Threshold (EBT) is the incident energy on a material that results in a 50% probability of breakopen. Breakopen is defined as any open area at least 1.6 cm² (0.5 in.²)
ATPV and EBT are both evaluated in the same test but the first point to be reached is the reported Arc Rating. IF the material has more thermal insulative value than tensile strength to heat, then it breaks open first. If the opposite is true it will allow burns BEFORE it breaks open.
If an EBT value is determined and it is found to be equal to or below a determined ATPV, then the EBT value shall be reported as the arc rating value and noted as Arc Rating (EBT).
If an EBT value is determined and it is found to be above a determined ATPV, then the ATPV result shall be reported as the Arc Rating (ATPV) of the tested specimen.
An additional way to look at these numbers:
Neither is better. Basically EBT fabrics are typically more insulative than they are strong and ATPV materials are stronger than they are insulative. Usually EBT indicates the garment is a knit and is more comfortable but essentially no less protective to the user.
See the recent post by ArcWear for updated information